By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:37 PM Post #126 of 192 [In reply to]
Never say never. Death or the breaking of vows would have to happen, neither of which I want, but it's not like it's totally out of the realm of possibility. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
Register or log in to reply
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:39 PM Post #127 of 192 [In reply to]
You have statistics that Born Again/Evangelicals are having abortions? All Christians do not qualify as Born Again/Evangelicals....you're mistaken. It's a liberal thing.
Scroll back a bit; I copied-and-pasted a paragraph and source saying 18% of women who have abortions identify as Born Again/Evangelical. Of course not all Christians identify with that movement; I know that. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:40 PM Post #128 of 192 [In reply to]
So if someone who doesn't have sex at all is abnormal, when should people start having sex to be considered normal? *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:40 PM Post #129 of 192 [In reply to]
Yeah but how many peolpe do you know who have green eyes and a widow's peak and my second toe is ridiculously longer than my first toe. That's kind of freaky.
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:41 PM Post #130 of 192 [In reply to]
Really? I thought it was a weak name-call. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:42 PM Post #131 of 192 [In reply to]
In your if's a man....Yeah.
By jhr61townie - Oct 30, 2007, 10:42 PM Post #132 of 192 [In reply to]
What else would you reply to. LOL! Your not a typical "woman" Most Women gravitate toward MEN to lay down with, to love, to have a life with!, not other women, it's not normal, I'm sorry to break the news to you.
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:44 PM Post #133 of 192 [In reply to]
Really? I thought it was a weak name-call.
Nope...... right on target.
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:44 PM Post #134 of 192 [In reply to]
I'm a SUPERFREAK! I've never been particularly interested in being normal, which has worked well for me so far. I'm not sure why jhr is so invested in my lack of normalcy or why she thinks it would bother me to be called abnormal, or indeed, why not being normal is anything to be ashamed of. Heck, I grew up next to Normal... *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By jhr61townie - Oct 30, 2007, 10:45 PM Post #135 of 192 [In reply to]
Never say never. Death or the breaking of vows would have to happen, neither of which I want, but it's not like it's totally out of the realm of possibility.
Typical in the life of lesbians that I know, and yes, I know a few....they go back to men, back to women, back to men, can't seem to make up their mind!
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:47 PM Post #136 of 192 [In reply to]
Low on creativity, though. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:48 PM Post #137 of 192 [In reply to]
..what? *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:49 PM Post #138 of 192 [In reply to]
Then I'd say they're not lesbians; they're bisexual. If they tell you they're lesbians, though, then it's their right to identify however they choose. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:50 PM Post #139 of 192 [In reply to]
So why should it bother me not to be normal? *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:50 PM Post #140 of 192 [In reply to]
Low on creativity, though.
You don't have to be creative when you're correct.
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:52 PM Post #141 of 192 [In reply to]
Makes for dull reading. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:52 PM Post #142 of 192 [In reply to]
So why should it bother me not to be normal?
I don't know but it seems that your are bothered.
By Harry Burton - Oct 30, 2007, 10:53 PM Post #143 of 192 [In reply to]
Makes for dull reading.
Then why respond?
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:53 PM Post #144 of 192 [In reply to]
Really? I'd say more amused than bothered. If I were bothered, I wouldn't be openly queer, would I? *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 10:57 PM Post #145 of 192 [In reply to]
Fair question. I'm working on other stuff, and giving this a small portion of my attention is entertaining? Also I'm still waiting for a couple answers to simple questions, which seem to be very difficult for someone to produce coherently. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By jhr61townie - Oct 30, 2007, 10:59 PM Post #146 of 192 [In reply to]
Then I'd say they're not lesbians; they're bisexual. If they tell you they're lesbians, though, then it's their right to identify however they choose.
o.k., then your obviously a true lesbian, never been with a man, yet you know how the majority think and feel, right, or are you truly pushing your personal lesbian thoughts and feelings which, as we both know, is not the Norm. If that's the case, why would you think we would ever agree on any opinion.
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 11:04 PM Post #147 of 192 [In reply to]
Wow, that first sentence is an incredibly jumped-to conclusion, not to mention erroneous. Where did I ever say I know how the majority think and feel? For that matter, where did I ever say I identify as a lesbian? And to review, my so-far unanswered questions: 1) Why is being outside the norm bad? 2) When should people have sex to be considered normal? There. That's four questions. I know it's a lot, but short answer format is fine; you don't have to write an essay for each one or anything. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By jhr61townie - Oct 30, 2007, 11:09 PM Post #148 of 192 [In reply to]
Wow, that first sentence is an incredibly jumped-to conclusion, not to mention erroneous. Where did I ever say I know how the majority think and feel? For that matter, where did I ever say I identify as a lesbian? And to review, my so-far unanswered questions: 1) Why is being outside the norm bad? 2) When should people have sex to be considered normal? There. That's four questions. I know it's a lot, but short answer format is fine; you don't have to write an essay for each one or anything.
Nor do I plan to write a essay. How about you write an essay and explain why you are abnormal?
By triquetra - Oct 30, 2007, 11:12 PM Post #149 of 192 [In reply to]
So your answer is that you don't have an answer for any of the above questions, not even the really easy one that has nothing to do with me personally. Color me shocked. *~*~*~* Luceo non uro
By jhr61townie - Oct 30, 2007, 11:23 PM Post #150 of 192 [In reply to]
So your answer is that you don't have an answer for any of the above questions, not even the really easy one that has nothing to do with me personally. Color me shocked.
I'm not shocked, you can't explain your sexual abnormality....it's like global warming...it's a hoax..it's learned deviant abnormal behavior and you just can't take the fact that a woman is taking you to task on it because most of the men here wouldn't dare!
Log in
Create login
1191 registered users
Complete forum list
Create a login
User profiles